CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Vše o procesorech Advanced Micro Devices.

Moderátoři: flanker, Eddward, Baneshee

Odpovědět
flanker
Moderátor
Moderátor
Uživatelský avatar
Registrován: 13. pro 2005
Bydliště: Brno
Kontaktovat uživatele:

CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Příspěvek od flanker »

Jak na tom je AMD FX Vishera, Bulldozer, Thuban případně core i3, i5 a i7 v hrách a při využití 2 a více grafických karet? To zjištoval Anandtech....Je přeci jen vidět, že Intel má navrch hlavně s 3 a více silnými grafickými kartami, ale zároveň je vidět i silnější část Vishery vůči Thubanům...

Obrázek
Obrázek

hry:
1 GPU
Obrázek

2GPU
Obrázek

3GPU
Obrázek

http://anandtech.com/show/6934/choosing ... u-at-1440p

A CPU for Single GPU Gaming: A8-5600K + Core Parking updates

If I were gaming today on a single GPU, the A8-5600K (or non-K equivalent) would strike me as a price competitive choice for frame rates, as long as you are not a big Civilization V player and don’t mind the single threaded performance. The A8-5600K scores within a percentage point or two across the board in single GPU frame rates with both a HD7970 and a GTX580, as well as feels the same in the OS as an equivalent Intel CPU. The A8-5600K will also overclock a little, giving a boost, and comes in at a stout $110, meaning that some of those $$$ can go towards a beefier GPU or an SSD. The only downside is if you are planning some heavy OS work – if the software is Piledriver-aware all might be well, although most processing is not, and perhaps an i3-3225 or FX-8350 might be worth a look.

A CPU for Dual GPU Gaming: i5-2500K or FX-8350

Looking back through the results, moving to a dual GPU setup obviously has some issues. Various AMD platforms are not certified for dual NVIDIA cards for example, meaning while they may excel for AMD, you cannot recommend them for Team Green. There is also the dilemma that while in certain games you can be fairly GPU limited (Metro 2033, Sleeping Dogs), there are others were having the CPU horsepower can double the frame rate (Civilization V).

After the overview, my recommendation for dual GPU gaming comes in at the feet of the i5-2500K. This recommendation may seem odd – these chips are not the latest from Intel, but chances are that pre-owned they will be hitting a nice price point, especially if/when people move over to Haswell. If you were buying new, the obvious answer would be looking at an i5-3570K on Ivy Bridge rather than the 2500K, so consider this suggestion a minimum CPU recommendation.

On the AMD side, the FX-8350 puts up a good show across most of the benchmarks, but falls spectacularly in Civilization V. If this is not the game you are aiming for and want to invest AMD, then the FX-8350 is a good choice for dual GPU gaming.

A CPU for Tri-GPU Gaming: i7-3770K with an x8/x4/x4 (AMD) or PLX (NVIDIA) motherboard

By moving up in GPU power we also have to boost the CPU power in order to see the best scaling at 1440p. It might be a sad thing to hear but the only CPU in our testing that provides the top frame rates at this level is the top line Ivy Bridge model. For a comparison point, the Sandy Bridge-E 6-core results were often very similar, but the price jump to such as setup is prohibitive to all but the most sturdy of wallets.

As noted in the introduction, using 3-way on NVIDIA with Ivy Bridge will require a PLX motherboard in order to get enough lanes to satisfy the SLI requirement of x8 minimum per CPU. This also raises the bar in terms of price, as PLX motherboards start around the $280 mark. For a 3-way AMD setup, an x8/x4/x4 enabled motherboard performs similarly to a PLX enabled one, and ahead of the slightly crippled x8/x8 + x4 variations. However investing in a PLX board would help moving to a 4-way setup should that be your intended goal. In either scenario, at stock clocks, the i7-3770K is the processor of choice from our testing suite.

A CPU for Quad-GPU Gaming: i7-3770K with a PLX motherboard

A four-way GPU configuration is for those insane few users that have both the money and the physical requirement for pixel power. We are all aware of the law of diminishing returns, and more often than not adding that fourth GPU is taking the biscuit for most resolutions. Despite this, even at 1440p, we see awesome scaling in games like Sleeping Dogs (+73% of a single card moving from three to four cards) and more recently I have seen that four-way GTX680s help give BF3 in Ultra settings a healthy 35 FPS minimum on a 4K monitor. So while four-way setups are insane, there is clearly a usage scenario where it matters to have card number four.

Our testing was pretty clear as to what CPUs are needed at 1440p with fairly powerful GPUs. While the i7-2600K was nearly there in all our benchmarks, only two sets of CPUs made sure of the highest frame rates – the i7-3770K and any six-core Sandy Bridge-E. As mentioned in the three-way conclusion, the price barrier to SB-E is a big step for most users (even if they are splashing out $1500+ on four big cards), giving the nod to an Ivy Bridge configuration. Of course that i7-3770K CPU will have to be paired with a PLX enabled motherboard as well.

One could argue that with overclocking the i7-2600K could come into play, and I don’t doubt that is the case. People building three and four way GPU monsters are more than likely to run extra cooling and overclock. Unfortunately that adds plenty of variables and extra testing which will have to be made at a later date. For now our recommendation at stock, for 4-way at 1440p, is an i7-3770K CPU.

What to Take Away From Our Testing

Ultimately the spectrum for testing this sort of thing is huge - the minute you deal with multiple GPUs in a system, testing different GPUs, testing different resolutions, testing different quality settings, and then extrapolating those across the normal array of benchmarks we apply to a GPU test, we might as well spend a month just looking at a single CPU platform!

We know the testing done here today looks at a niche scenario - 1440p at Max Settings using very powerful GPUs. The trend in gaming, as I see it, will be towards the higher resolution panels, and with Korean 27" monitors coming into the market, if you're ok with that sort of monitor it is a direction to take to improve your gaming experience. 4K is on the horizon, which means either more pixel pushing power or lower resolutions/settings if you want the quality. Testing at 1440p/max settings is something I like to test as it pushes the GPU and hopefully the rest of the system - if you're a gamer, you want the best experience, and finding the hardware to do that is one of the most important things in that process (after getting good at the game you want).
ROG Power PC1:AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, Crosshair VII Hero, ROG Ryuo II 360, 512GB NVMe+500GB Samsung SSD, 2x 16GB GSkill TridentZ Neo RGB 3600 MHz, Dual RTX 2060,CM V750, Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL. PC2:AMD FX-8370, Silentium Fera, Asus 970 Pro Gaming/Aura, 240GB SSD HyperX 3K, R9-270X OC, 2x 4GB GSkill RipjawsX 2400 MHz, Corsair AX750, Bitfenix Pandora
Hladis
Moderátor
Moderátor
Uživatelský avatar
Registrován: 24. čer 2004
Bydliště: Varnsdorf - Athens

Re: CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Příspěvek od Hladis »

No grafy jsi vytahnul jen ty privetivy (Flankere ty proste nikdy nebudes objektivni). Jinak to celkove vypada trochu jinak :) Dále Benche vesmes syntetika a her zalostne malo na to, aby mohli cokoliv soudit a ještě tam hodit absolutne nenarocny Dirt .......no je jasny, ze jen v Civ5 to skalovalo nejak vic, neb jako jedina z tech her potřebuje i CPU power. V souhrnu nic moc test.
flanker
Moderátor
Moderátor
Uživatelský avatar
Registrován: 13. pro 2005
Bydliště: Brno
Kontaktovat uživatele:

Re: CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Příspěvek od flanker »

no ale shrnutí sedí...FX 8350 ještě celkem utáhne dvě silné karty, pak už začne být s více neefektivní. V tom tetsu mě ale překvapil A10-5800K, že si s jednou silnou GPU vedl celkem dobře.
ROG Power PC1:AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, Crosshair VII Hero, ROG Ryuo II 360, 512GB NVMe+500GB Samsung SSD, 2x 16GB GSkill TridentZ Neo RGB 3600 MHz, Dual RTX 2060,CM V750, Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL. PC2:AMD FX-8370, Silentium Fera, Asus 970 Pro Gaming/Aura, 240GB SSD HyperX 3K, R9-270X OC, 2x 4GB GSkill RipjawsX 2400 MHz, Corsair AX750, Bitfenix Pandora
CageJ
Moderátor
Moderátor
Uživatelský avatar
Registrován: 31. bře 2011
Bydliště: Praha, Prešov
Kontaktovat uživatele:

Re: CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Příspěvek od CageJ »

LGA1155 ma jeden velky problem...malo PCI liniek 8)
AMD RYZEN 2700X 4.2GHz@watercooled, 32GB DDR4 2,8GHz, AsRock B450 GAMING K4, RIOTORO GOLD 650W; ASUS DUAL RTX 2060; CoolerMaster ML500; AMD RYZEN 3600X, NOCTUA NH-D15, ASUS STRIX B450-F GAMING, SuperFlower GK550, 32GB CL14 G.SKILL 3200, FRACTAL DESIGN XL R4, ASUS STRIX RTX 3080 OC; APPLE MacBook AIR M1 iPhone 12 Pro 128GB
Hladis
Moderátor
Moderátor
Uživatelský avatar
Registrován: 24. čer 2004
Bydliště: Varnsdorf - Athens

Re: CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Příspěvek od Hladis »

No ale výsledek je prezentovan jen na trech hrach a k tomu ještě uz postarších. Z toho se moc při rozdilnosti vysledku dle hry vycist neda a nejde vyrknout ortel. Pokud bych chtěl tohle hodnotit, tak tech testovanych her by mělo byt podstatne vic. Proto ten test je proste nic extra.
flanker
Moderátor
Moderátor
Uživatelský avatar
Registrován: 13. pro 2005
Bydliště: Brno
Kontaktovat uživatele:

Re: CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Příspěvek od flanker »

no ale zas je chápu, časově by to bylo šílené...Vím, jak se ted nadřu u testů, někdy je to na špagát :)
ROG Power PC1:AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, Crosshair VII Hero, ROG Ryuo II 360, 512GB NVMe+500GB Samsung SSD, 2x 16GB GSkill TridentZ Neo RGB 3600 MHz, Dual RTX 2060,CM V750, Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL. PC2:AMD FX-8370, Silentium Fera, Asus 970 Pro Gaming/Aura, 240GB SSD HyperX 3K, R9-270X OC, 2x 4GB GSkill RipjawsX 2400 MHz, Corsair AX750, Bitfenix Pandora
CageJ
Moderátor
Moderátor
Uživatelský avatar
Registrován: 31. bře 2011
Bydliště: Praha, Prešov
Kontaktovat uživatele:

Re: CPUčka vs 1/2/3/4 silné GPU a hry...Anandtech

Příspěvek od CageJ »

Chcel by som test, kde bude FX8350 merane na 2x 8-linkach.
AMD RYZEN 2700X 4.2GHz@watercooled, 32GB DDR4 2,8GHz, AsRock B450 GAMING K4, RIOTORO GOLD 650W; ASUS DUAL RTX 2060; CoolerMaster ML500; AMD RYZEN 3600X, NOCTUA NH-D15, ASUS STRIX B450-F GAMING, SuperFlower GK550, 32GB CL14 G.SKILL 3200, FRACTAL DESIGN XL R4, ASUS STRIX RTX 3080 OC; APPLE MacBook AIR M1 iPhone 12 Pro 128GB
Odpovědět

Zpět na „Procesory AMD“