PCTuning fórum

ArgCZ píše:tak jako kdyby někdo před půl rokem tady řekl že AMD vydá 8c/16t s IPC pro hry jako Ivy Bridge, pro pracovní nasazení s IPC Broadwellu-E pod 10 000,- s potenciálem 4GHz a spotřebou srovnatelnou s Intelem....

no všichni by se mu vysmáli

3tp2 píše:Bavíme se čistě o hrách
Prostě Ryzen není na hry,stejně jako nebylo FX

del42sa píše:

3tp2 píše:Bavíme se čistě o hrách
Prostě Ryzen není na hry,stejně jako nebylo FX

ten matroš co bereš bych chtěl taky každopádně díky za blábol roku

Ryzen is an excellent workstation CPU, but gamers should look elsewhere.

Aneb když vám nevychází herní testy tak jak potřebujete,tak si při hraní pustíte do pozadí nějakej ten encodink + browser aby to alespon trochu vypadalo. Jo tohle přesně většina z nás při hraní dělá

arach píše:jen celkem lituju lidi, co si koupili treba za sedmicku i5 : -)))

del42sa píše:

3tp2 píše:Bavíme se čistě o hrách
Prostě Ryzen není na hry,stejně jako nebylo FX

ten matroš co bereš bych chtěl taky každopádně díky za blábol roku

Srandista píše:Mna by zaujimalo, ci je mozne nejakou upravou mikrokodu zlepsit efektivitu SMT.

In addition to Lisa's comments, there are also some variables that could affect performance:

1) Early motherboard BIOSes were certainly troubled: disabling unrelated features would turn off cores. Setting memory overclocks on some motherboards would disable boost. Some BIOS revisions would plain produce universally suppressed performance.

2) Ryzen benefits from disabling High Precision Event Timers (HPET). The timer resolution of HPET can cause an observer effect that can subtract performance. This is a BIOS option, or a function that can be disabled from the Windows command shell.

3) Ryzen benefits from enabling the High Performance power profile. This overrides core parking. Eventually we will have a driver that allows people to stay on balanced and disable core parking anyways. Gamers have been doing this for a while, too.

These are just some examples of the early growing pains that can be overcome with time.
=============================================
Ryzen is doing really well in 1440p and 4K gaming when the applications are more graphics bound. And we do exceptionally well in rendering and workstation applications where more cores are really useful. In 1080p, we have tested over 100+ titles in the labs…. And depending on the test conditions, we do better in some games and worse in others. We hear people on wanting to see improved 1080p performance and we fully expect that Ryzen performance in 1080p will only get better as developers get more time with “Zen”. We have over 300+ developers now working with "Zen" and several of the developers for Ashes of Singularity and Total Warhammer are actively optimizing now
=======================================
First, I think it's important that readers get a complete picture of a processor. People who have 1440p and 4K displays deserve to read how their potential processor will perform on the monitor they have. Don't you agree?

We're also not shying away from the 1080p results. We clearly have some work to do with game developers on some of these titles to invest in the vital optimizations that can so dramatically improve an application's performance on a new microarchitecture. This takes time, but we'll get it done.

But what's also clear is that there's a distribution of games that run well, and a distribution of games that run poorly. Call it a "bell curve" if you will. It's unfortunate that the outliers are some notable titles, but many of these game devs (e.g. Oxide, Sega, Bethesda) have already said there's significant improvement that can be gleaned.

We have proven the Zen performance and IPC. Many reviewers today proved that, at 1080p in games. There is no architectural reason why the remaining titles should be performing as they are.