Moderátoři: morke, Walker1134, Wilik
Můžu potvrdit.no-X píše:Vyzkoušel jsem nové Catalyst Control Center z Cat.7.2 - nabíhá mi minimálně 3x rychleji, než staré (takový rozdíl jsem ani nečekal) a pokud už bylo od startu PC jednou otevřené, jen problikne logo a objeví se. Takže doporučuji!
CCC se vůbec nezapínalo, nereagovalo.Tak jsem je odinstaloval, proces zmizel a s 7.1 mám klid.Teď zkouším Visty, ve kterých dávám 7.2 druhou šanci.
The Vista driver model does incur a small CPU overhead compared to Windows XP in order to copy driver commands from user mode memory to dma buffers that are read by the GPU. This can be a 5-10% overhead, depending on the application and how well the driver is written. But the important thing to understand is that this overhead is only seen on CPU limited cases, which means low resolution and no anti-aliasing.
Actually, F.E.A.R. was a different issue. Our initial Vista D3D driver was missing some multithreading optimizations, due to some churn in the multithreading model leading up to Vista RTM. You will be happy to learn that we have restored performance parity on F.E.A.R. in our Catalyst release for March.
The new OpenGL driver has been designed from the ground up for Windows Vista, Windows XP and Linux and internally we are running and testing it on all three (or six if you count the 64 bit versions). As we planned the transition to the new OpenGL driver, it did not make sense to port the previous OpenGL driver to Vista. So as Vista approached, it naturally became the launch vehicle for the new driver and its highest priority. The XP and Linux versions of this new OpenGL driver will ship later this year.
The Catalyst Control Center still has a lot of life in it. Longer term our goal is continue to improve the user experience and to move towards a single or central user interface where AMD customers can configure the majority of AMD product settings. It is our goal and vision to eventually have a single UI for all AMD products (graphics, CPU, chipset), but this is of course a major project, and it will be quite some time before we're able to release such a product.
That being said, AMD has put a significant amount of time into developing drivers for physics support and developing tools that third party companies can work with to support GPGPU applications (we are currently working with a number of companies on this initiative). You'll definitely see applications later this year and next that take advantage of AMD's Stream Computing.
However it is way too soon to look beyond DX10 in terms of game usage of graphics. Frankly we have seen very few games yet make full use of DX9 shader model 3.0. And DX10 game development is still in its infancy. I think you, ISVs and gamers are going to be amazed once ISVs really get DX10 fully utilized and showing its power and flexibility.
nj skoda ze je 06 tak pro Nvidiackej test ve hrach to bude urcite jeste vetsi rozdil. nebo snad uz konecne 3D mark 07 navaze na 05 ta je podle me stale nejlepsi na testovani ma lepsi vypovidajici hodnotu o vykonu na hry nez 06patriarchf píše:3DMark06 cca. +8% v dx9 proti non OC 8800GTX, dx10 bude zajímavější....
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?optio ... &Itemid=34
Na rovnakom CPU ,Core 2 Extreme QC6700patriarchf píše:3DMark06 cca. +8% v dx9 proti non OC 8800GTX, dx10 bude zajímavější....
, tak doufám, že se nezklamu... Na fudzille to je hned v nadpise, a obidvoje je test v 3D marku 06 takze to nieje nic ine, to pre porovnanie nabuduce to poriadne precitaj. Tie vysledky su na CPU C2D Extreme Quad Core 6700.patriarchf píše:to michigen: asi jsem slepej, ale ty čísla na fudzille nevidím, linkoval jsem to já a vidím tam 11400+ nonocgtx8800 10600 a oc 11100 a druhý link je snad trochu něco jiného, ne?
