Moderátoři: Walker1134, Wilik
facility píše:
zda sa ze sa neco znova deje.....i v Japonsku???
GTX260-Prepocet na Czk
GTX280-Prepocet na Czk
Zadne naklady na dopravu , minimalni marze protoze to jde pres minimum obchodniku 
Ale jinak ty ceny , to je krasa Kdyby to bylo za tyhle prachy u nas vubec bych se nezlobil.
tj.o 1400 Kc...viac.
Bohuzel zatim vsechno co Charlie na Inquireru rekl za minuly pulrok se v poslednich 2 mesicich ukazuje jako pravda, takze mu verim vic, nez slovum "ver ze NV bude jiz na podzim opet na koni" a "to co pises je uplne picovina". To, co jsi v diskuzich rikal ty, se vyplnilo tak z 50%, a to je 2x mensi uspesnost, nez Charlie.OBR píše:No to je ale konina, EVGA a XFX budou dal First Trier partnerem NV, to co pises je uplne picovina. Spoluprace se neplanuje na zakladne momentalniho neuspechu, ale dlouhodiobe a ver ze NV bude jiz na podzim opet na koni s 55nm G200 kartama ... alespon ve stredni a vyssi tride.
Bohužel, to co tady tvrdíš, není pravda. Např.: http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/ ... ng-gpu-warRobin_CG píše:...
Bohuzel zatim vsechno co Charlie na Inquireru rekl za minuly pulrok se v poslednich 2 mesicich ukazuje jako pravda, takze mu verim vic, nez slovum "ver ze NV bude jiz na podzim opet na koni" a "to co pises je uplne picovina". To, co jsi v diskuzich rikal ty, se vyplnilo tak z 50%, a to je 2x mensi uspesnost, nez Charlie.
Bohuzel ne. 3DMark je stejne "technologicky poplatny" a ma stejnou vypovidajici hodnotu jako jakakoliv individualni hra. Body v 3DMarku rikaji, jak dobre bezi 3DMark, nic vic, nic min. A vzhledem k tomu, ze 3DMark nikoho nezivi a jen velmi malo lidi bavi sledovani jeho prubehu, tak ma jeho vysledek jeste mensi realnej dopad nez naka hra.Dawe111 píše:Umíš jenom papouškovat po no-x, ..3DMark technologicky poplatný době a daným hrám má perfektní vypovídající hodnotu, pouze Radeonům poněkud nadržuje, protože ATi tradičně není schopna optimalizace ovladačů pro hry.
NV graphics drivers 177.70 outflow, GT200 new products appear!
Xfastest recently released the latest version of the Froceware 177.70, the driver of the nv_disp.inf this paper we find that the new GT200:
NVIDIA_GT200.DEV_05E0.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce GT200-400"
NVIDIA_GT200.DEV_05FD.1 = "NVIDIA GT200-875-GL"
NVIDIA_GT200.DEV_05FE.1 = "NVIDIA GT200-850-GL"
The emergence of new device ID that NVIDIA is preparing a new product based on the GT200 will be before the rumors said the 55 nanometer GT200?
http://www.chw.net/foro/nvidia-lanzara- ... ost2166398NVIDIA lanzará Big Bang II en Septiembre
Více na: DigiTimes.comDigiTimes píše:Due to Nvidia did not clearly explaining the details of the faults reported in its notebook GPUs, some channel vendors have demanded graphics card makers issue a recall for desktop-based discrete graphics cards using the same GPU core, according to sources at graphics card makers.
Nvidia has commented that the faulty notebook GPU problem only exists in a few specific notebook models made by specific clients. The company contended that desktop-based discrete graphics card products are not affected by the issue.
Hm - nic "více" tam nevidím.Krteq píše:Více na: DigiTimes.com
Šedá část označená šipkou znázorňuje rozdíl mezi jádry G94-300-A1 (65nm) a G94-300-B1 (55nm) - Klikněte pro originál die-shot G94-300-B1Expreview.com píše:Right after 9800GTX+, NVIDIA begin shrinking 9600GT to 55nm. But this time is a bit different, there will not be another plus mark after 9600GT’s name because NVIDIA want more stealth.
The only change of 55nm version is the mark on die. The mark on a 65nm die is G94-300-A1 and 55nm die is G94-300-B1. The clock keeps 650MHz/1625MHz/900MHz (core/shader/mem) so more overclocking headroom can be leave to customers and vendor partners.
Podle všeho jen orientační bod na balení čipu pro srovnání die-shotů. Nic jako GT+ v tom nehledej.JSzu píše:Co je to plusko na ktere ukazuje ta druha sipka?
Zdroj: TechReport.comTechReport píše:The GeForce GTX 200-series graphics cards have been out for over a month now, but Nvidia continues to build out its GeForce 9 lineup. Just this morning, the firm quietly released a pair of new graphics cards: the GeForce 9500 GT and the GeForce 9800 GT.
The GeForce 9800 GT is perhaps the least interesting, since it apparently has the exact same specs as the 8800 GT: 112 stream processors with a 600MHz core speed, 1500MHz shader speed, 256-bit memory interface, and 512MB of GDDR3 RAM clocked at 900MHz (1800MT/s). The two cards have near-identical single-slot coolers, as well.
At the more affordable end of the spectrum, Nvidia has added the GeForce 9500 GT. The GPU on this card features 32 stream processors and a 550MHz core speed, 1400MHz shader speed, and 128-bit memory interface. Nvidia quotes three different memory configurations for 9500 GT cards: 512MB of 500MHz DDR2, 256MB of 800MHz (1600MT/s) GDDR3, and 512MB of 800MHz GDDR3. (For reference, the GeForce 9600 GT has twice as many stream processors, higher clocks, a wider memory bus, and half a gig of memory by default.)
Two flavors of the 9500 GT have already appeared at Newegg: a $69.99 eVGA card with reference clocks, and an $89.99 Gigabyte variant with a 700MHz core speed. Both have 512MB of 800MHz GDDR3 RAM. More 9500 GTs are on the way, too: Palit has announced two variants, including one with 1GB of 800MHz DDR2 RAM and a passive cooler.
