Nebo se spis nikdo nepriznal, aby nevypadal jako blbec, ze mlati do CPU kladivem.Jeste to cpu nikdo s touhle metodou neznicil, coz se o ziletce rict neda.
samozrejme to uletet muze, ale to se da zaridit tak aby to spadlo do "periny".
) a samozřejmě v pohodě, ale teploty už kolem těch 80C a to z chladiče nevyfukoval nijak horký vzduch, takže o tom přepastování opravdu přemýšlím... Jinak z desky jsem opravdu nadšen, tolik možností v biosu jsem ještě neviděl a že jsem měl desek opravdu hodně.
presne takEddward píše:aha jasne,, takze to je ten kus co sme sa bavili nedavno...
v podstate identicky s mojim 3570K... 4,5Ghz na 1.312V ale vyssie ani za nic, 4,6Ghz neda ani s 1.35V
kazdopadne taky cip by som bral, ako minimum
Prior to each processor release, Intel produces a number of engineering sample chips. These chips are, theoretically, identical to the finished retail product, minus a few last-minute fixes that may be inserted to work around some bug or other. They are provided to hardware partners in order for pre-release engineering work - designing desktops, laptops, tablets and mobiles around the requirements of the part - to be carried out before mass production begins. This allows manufacturers to launch their products day-and-date with Intel's chip release.
Sadly, it doesn't appear to have worked out quite that way for Haswell. According to PC Pro, manufacturers who produce pre-overclocked gaming systems have found that the retail chips they've just received are only hitting speeds of 4.2GHz to 4.4GHz stably compared to up to 4.8GHz with pre-production engineering samples.
One manufacturer claims that pre-release chips marked as 3.5GHz parts were tested completely stably at 4.8GHz, but of the 40-50 retail units the company has tested not a single one has managed to reach above 4.2GHz without hitting unsafe temperatures or requiring too-high levels of voltage. Another firm has stated that it has had to drop plans to offer pre-overclocked Haswell systems running at 4.5GHz - a figure, again, planned based on engineering work carried out on pre-production samples provided by Intel - to 4.3GHz in order to ensure stability. 'There is a big difference in the overclocking potential between early Haswell samples and retail,' the unnamed manufacturer claimed.
Another manufacturer claims that retail Haswell parts are proving too hot to handle, stating that even while running at stock speeds the chips reach higher temperatures than the pre-production engineering samples - by around 15 degrees Celsius, according to the unnamed company's tests - or even the retail models of Intel's last-generation Ivy Bridge chips.
Waleron píše:Mám doma tehle zdroj
http://www.czc.cz/corsair-builder-serie ... 55/produkt
, bude mi fungovat s i5-4670k. Haswell prý má nějakou noviku (nějaký C), která by se dala v biosu vypnout, aby nedocházelo k problémum. Nevím kde jsem to četl.
Děkuji za odpovědi
Edit: Dík
Čekal jsem na Haswella od ledna, a rozhodně do něj chci jít, zejména kvůli vylepšené GPU. Dedikovanou zatím potřebovat nebudu, jde mi zejména o výpočetní výkon. Záleží na tvé preferenci. Haswell má vyšší teploty a možnosti taktování nejsou tak dobré jako u IvyBridge... Je to na tobě, pročti si téma a ostatní taky poradí. Nechci radit, spíše jenom sdělit, jak jsem se rozhodl já 
