Tak podle originálního postu na Baidu se jednalo a chiller (-20°C).flanker píše:jj, toto je asi strop s velmi dobrým AIO chlazením pro benchmark a s celkem dobrým kusem procesoru. Myslím, že většina bdue ráda za Cinebench na 5100-5200 MHz
Using a 240mm AIO radiator, the Core i9-10900K consumed 235 Watts at full load in the AIDA64 FPU stress test. The chip also ran at a peak temperature of 93C and an average temp of 87C. That's an 18C difference between the Core i9-10900F and the Core i9-10900K. The unlocked CPU does run at higher clock speeds and hence runs hotter and consumes more power at full load.
The CPU was running at 4.8 GHz which is the peak all-core boost frequency without Intel's Thermal Velocity Boost. For Thermal Velocity Boost to function, the CPU needs to sit at under 70C which isn't going to happen with a 240mm AIO liquid cooler. It looks like anyone using a Core i9-10900K would have to get hands-on a higher-end cooling setup, say a 360mm AIO, or a custom-loop solution to get the Core i9-10900K running at its highest rated clock speeds.
. 90C je ještě "dobrý", tj max je snad až 110C.
Smazánoflanker píše:recenze Core i5-10400 s 6C/12T
https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2218670-1-1.html
co se jednou objeví na internetu už jen tak nezmizíspajdr píše:Smazáno
